Pakistan discusses plight of Muslims and other minorities in India

The plight of minorities in India had been a great cause of concern even before the creation of Pakistan, said Khalid Mehmood. He held the minorities in India were being subjected to communal violence on a large scale; demolition of Babri Mosque in December 1992 and communal riots in Indian Gujarat in February 2002 being the prime examples of communal riots among others.

New Delhi will only discuss Pakistan-controlled Kashmir, says Indian envoy

He opined the rise of Modi would also mark the rise of Hindu extremism. Initially the Muslims were the primary target, later the tide of communal violence engulfed other minorities as well, he stated.

The movements like Ghar Wapsi were yet another label for persecution of minorities which promoted massive conversions to Hinduism under the cloak of better opportunities.

During his election campaign, Modi declared that he would adopt a muscular policy towards Pakistan which did not bode well to already stiff Pak-India relations. With Modi’s ascent to power, Hindu hardliners believe that they have full freedom to exercise their religious fanaticism. Religious fanaticism under Modi’s patronage had tarnished India’s secular image in the world, Mr Mehmood concluded.

Dr Shaheen Akhtar, Associate Professor at National Defence University Islamabad, while discussing “Indian Secularism: Myth or Reality”, stated that secularism despite being a part of Indian constitution had remained a myth.

Another Pakistani victim of Indian INTOLERANCE

Divorcing religion from politics, could ensure secularism, which was a far cry in Indian political stage, given recent wave of extremism, she said.

Dr Akhtar also highlighted how different leaders were using religion for their political agendas.

The ‘secular’ Indian state did not intervene or take any measure to prevent demolition of the Babari Mosque in 1992, which betrayed its false claims of secularism, she maintained.

Pakistan, India agree to restart ‘comprehensive’ dialogue process

Quaid-e-Azam University Assistant Professor Dr Muhammad Mujeeb Afzal highlighted the plight of Indian Muslims and other minorities under BJP. He was of the view that a state which claimed to be a pluralistic, and democratic, minorities should be free to exercise their fundamental rights.

On the contrary, minorities were being seen as a burden, he commented.

He added that Indian Muslims were the largest and unique minority. In spite of heavy rhetoric on secularism, Indians opted to play communal cards when it came to practice, he said.

Dr Afzal stated: “Jamiat-Ulmai Hind and Congress alliance had never broken since 1929 after the Jamiat avowed not to use Sharia Law and believe in one nation theory.

“Majority of hardliners in India believed that the minorities were sucking their resources and contributing nothing towards the country’s development.”

He further said the Indian Muslims were foreigners and disloyal people according to Hindutva. The hardliners maintained that Muslims should accept their subordinate status in India, he said.

On the contrary, minorities were being seen as a burden, he commented.

He added that Indian Muslims were the largest and unique minority. In spite of heavy rhetoric on secularism, Indians opted to play communal cards when it came to practice, he said.

Dr Afzal stated: “Jamiat-Ulmai Hind and Congress alliance had never broken since 1929 after the Jamiat avowed not to use Sharia Law and believe in one nation theory.

“Majority of hardliners in India believed that the minorities were sucking their resources and contributing nothing towards the country’s development.”

He further said the Indian Muslims were foreigners and disloyal people according to Hindutva. The hardliners maintained that Muslims should accept their subordinate status in India, he said.

Given the chequered history of Pak-India relations, the Hindu communalism would continue to mar the relationship, she opined. The 2002 attacks were devastating as they brought an end to all forms of dialogue.

The US administration had also alluded to growing Hindu communalism. All Indian attempts to isolate Pakistan had come to naught, the former ambassador stated.

“In the name of religion, atrocities are being committed in India. Waking up of anti-Pakistan sentiment meant that people to people contact would be affected by the hatred generated against Pakistan.”

She further said that crushing Kashmiris would only generate pro Pakistani sentiment among them. Also, hostility was being fuelled by the hardships faced by people living around LoC.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s